Whether you’re planning your own future arrangements or dealing with end-of-life matters for someone you care about, cremation is a popular alternative compared to traditional burial. Many individuals have two different options; the first is the traditional route of fire-based cremation, and the second is water-based cremation, also called aquamation or alkaline hydrolysis. Knowing the crucial differences between these two methods empowers you to make informed choices based on financial, environmental, and personal considerations.
Understanding Fire-Based Cremation
Fire-based cremation is the most frequently used cremation method, and its practice goes back centuries across many cultures. The deceased is placed in a cremation chamber where heat of 1,400 to 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit converts the remains into ashes. These remains are returned to the deceased’s family as a processed fine powder in an urn.
This traditional form of cremation is widely available through many crematories and funeral homes. It’s also an efficient process that takes anywhere from 90 minutes to three hours. Fire-based cremation enjoys widespread acceptance, and many families take comfort from the longstanding history behind it.
The environmental impact is debatable. Fire-based cremation does save the ground surface area from being used for burial, but the process can release atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide and mercury, often from dental fillings. The process also uses substantial amounts of propane or natural gas. High-temperature processes use more energy than water-based options.
Understanding Water-Based Cremation
The newer and more eco-friendly alternative of water-based cremation puts the deceased in a chamber filled with 5% potassium hydroxide and 95% water. Heating this solution makes it circulate gently to accelerate the natural process of decomposition. In just a few hours, only bone fragments remain; these get processed into the ashes returned to the deceased’s family.
Fewer carbon emissions result, and there are no harmful pollutants released. This process uses less energy, and the lack of direct flame makes it a gentler process some families prefer, given how it mimics natural decomposition.
Unfortunately, not every country or state permits this process, so accessibility is limited. It can also take between four and eight hours, which is longer than traditional cremation. Limited availability and specialized equipment can lead to higher costs in many locations.
Mind These Factors When Choosing
When making a choice between fire- or water-based cremation, keep in mind personal and religious beliefs, environmental concerns, budget, and availability. Certain religions have specific views regarding both cremation and the particular methods involved, so see what your faith has in terms of guidance and restrictions. If reducing your carbon footprint is a point of emphasis in your family, water-based cremation aligns better. However, water-based cremation isn’t legal everywhere, so fire-based cremation might be more accessible. Fire-based cremation is also frequently more affordable, thanks to widespread use; having said that, costs do vary by market and region.
Both Are Dignified Ways
Both methods of cremation are dignified ways to you can choose to honor someone you love. Fire-based cremation is a traditional and practical path to take if accessibility and cost are pertinent factors, but water-based cremation can be the greener choice if you’re worried about environmental impact. Talk to your loved ones about their preferences and research local regulations to make sure the right decision is made for your family’s situation and needs.
