Creationism Vs Evolution - Did Dinosaurs Live Among Us? - By: Benito Burch

Among this species only one mutation occurs leading to a bird which has a slightly modified beak. As long as one can find soft seeds available the mutant parrot follows the behaviour of this non-mutant congeners, of which the "conformity police" assures that this correct "Meme" (the total variety of knowledge of a species, such as behaviour patterns) is carried. In this case: eat fluffy seeds.

Comes along a severe winter and soft seeds become scarce. This will be the antithesis and stimulus for development (second stage). Nuts which has a hard shell, which have some sort of appearance, which is quite like the soft seeds, are however abundant a result of the absence of other animal species eating these. It happens the mutant bird accidentally stumbles upon these nuts and with the virtue of his slightly modified beak develops a technique, with which the bird after a number of attempts succeeds in cracking your nuts. The development of this technique is a conscious experience.

The mutant chicken survives the hard winter within a healthy condition, which is helpful in succeeding to find a non-mutant mate to get kids. Some of the offspring inherit a mutant trait.

The mutant bird being "diversity generator" transmits its knowledge being novel Meme to its mutant offspring, which are more successful compared to a other birds in the join up. This is the third position or semi-stasis, wherein the "inner judges" in the species will determine which pattern is followed.

In fact it is a new type of Larmarckian approach (evolution by inheritance of traits acquired from the parents), which does never deny Darwinist natural selection: Sanctioned synthesis of both theories.

The "Meme" knowledge has grown to become automatised to such an level, that the species is not anymore aware of the "conscious experience" of which preceded its "incarnation". The involution of becoming instinctive has expressed itself like an evolved trait.

Now let's take these notions to a higher (fifth) level with intergroup tournaments, which I argued in the previously mentioned article sometimes leads to evolution like niching or symbiosis (seventh level), via the second time beginners stage of distinction-probing (sixth level). Could it be there is also an exchange of features between different species. Could there be similar to "cross-species Meme-transmission"? Could it be that imitation in the behaviour of another different types occurs?

Imagine a mutant mammal by having a beak-like mouth. Could it copy the actions of birds by consciously observing that the birds use their beaks and wanting to imitate this. If it gives an advantage, the mutant mammal may evolve an even bigger beak and evolve in to a Platypus-type creature. It would certainly be interesting to examine, whether behaviour can be transmitted in the cross-species manner to give this hypothesis some support.
By letting go of a narrow interpretation the truly lasting debate between creationists as well as evolutionists can thus be resolved as explained here above by showing that their teachings really do not necessarily contradict each other.
.
What exactly is spontaneous iteration? It is simply the proven fact that life can come from points that were never alive before. They just 'appear' to be a life form.

For any that believe in the idea of evolution, it means that will rock, chemicals and elements accidentally came together to life.

In the dark ages this idea was accepted by everyone.

About the Author

Creation versus evolutionism debates. That really made the universe? Where does right and wrong hails from? Where do lasw come from? Find out at http: //www. bible-tube. com The science page.

evolution versus creationism debate, creation versus evolution debate, creation

Article Directory Source: http://www.articlerich.com/profile/Benito-Burch/218214

Additional Articles From - Home | Reference & education | Science